I catch
this segment on my commute home every so often and when I do, it invariably frustrates me to no end. It's written by a critic named James C. Taylor, who mostly alternates discussing one of a handful of local, flagshippy, regionals every week. On tonight's broadcast, Taylor let CTG have it for not staging more new work by local playwrights! A bold critique! Surprising too! Let's see how he goes about making it.
Seems like his main beef was with the fact that they let
Passing Strange slip away. How's that for new and local?
And let's not forget that Stew, the show's writer and star, hates L.A. and has since he was 9-years-old. This is, if memory serves, a pretty big part of that show of his.
LAWeekly went through all this in an interview with Stew and his collaborator, Heidi Rodewald, almost a year ago. That interview contained the following quote from Rodewald:
People say, ‘Why don’t you bring the play to Los Angeles?’ And we say, ‘How about if we don’t?’ ”
Listen, I loved
Passing Strange when I saw it in New York, but it's a TONY NOMINEE. By a writer who HATES L.A. and calls BERLIN home. Why should we even expect it to show up here, much less get CTG some new local cred?
His segment continues with a negative review of Danny Hoch's show at the Kirk Douglas,
Taking Over, which made all the obvious points about the show that
McNulty covered right after it opened, and frankly, they were all sentiments I gathered from reading the
LATimes preview piece about the show that told me it wouldn't really be my cup of tea. Taylor's right in questioning the reasoning behind bringing the piece here in the first place, but there isn't much in the way of fresh insights in that review.
AND, in some of the oddest segues ever, he uses the fact that
Passing Strange and
Taking Over share a relationship with the Public to suggest that
a new Sondheim show make its way out to L.A. There's a novel way to help out new L.A. musicals. Advocate more exposure for Stephen Sondheim.
I've checked Theatre Talk's
archives, and looking back over 2009 so far, the edgiest he gets is Long Beach Opera. In between he reviews a 16-year-old Peter Hall production of The Magic Flute at LAOpera, something at South Coast Rep, does a New Year's segment detailing upcoming shows at The Old Globe, Pasadena Playhouse, Donmar Warehouse, The Geffen Playhouse, CTG, some Shakespeare productions in New York, and various other stuff on Broadway.
But my favorite is his
tribute to Harold Pinter, where he says this--
[S]ince winning the Nobel Prize for Literature back in 2005, there has not been a rush to stage Pinter's work here in LA.
Never mind the fact that there were two productions of
Betrayal running in L.A. simultaneously last year. I also saw a production of
The Caretaker in the recent past that ran for eons, and I know I'm probably forgetting about a half-dozen other recent productions in 99-seat theaters across the city.
Going back a little further I did find a couple of pieces on 99-seat shows. One was
a piece on a show at The Blank that was a west coast premiere, and another on
Louis and Keely Live at the Sahara about 6 months after all the local critics were raving about it at Sacred Fools. He waited until it moved to another theater and had won the Ovation for Best Musical.
Mr. Taylor, thanks for advocating for local premieres by local playwrights, but you might be a little bit more satisfied if you actually went to any one of the countless theaters in Los Angeles that are already doing just that. You can start by checking the new shows at
Iama,
Circle X, and
Theatre of NOTE, try to see
Good Bobby this weekend if you can get there before it closes, and keep an eye out for the next time
Lucid-By-Proxy does a world premiere by someone local, since that's just about all they ever do. And those are just off the top of my head.